 |
| one of the ceramic plates of Peter de laurentiis |
the watchword is: abolish the rules. and this is now the center also agree that not only supports, but proposes privatization rain. the rules will individuals, decide how, where and how; and the when, the answer is when will want.
abolish the rules is not enough: it is good to go through the fact that public intervention has to disappear, and no longer be a factor in competition, and therefore dampening action against the private sector.
I am convinced that health, education, transport and housing (designed this program as housing ) activities are to be given to the public purse, such as justice or the administration, why are sectors in which profit is a distortion, where the market is an injustice.
for the truth, in Italy, thanks to the notorious Article 41 of the Constitution, Until not many years ago (though many, actually), even the housing sector was public or private : the great age of plan ina-house it was the apotheosis qualitative, that the apotheosis of the IACP quantitative. and when the quality collapsed, rather than ask why and find solutions, the answer was the abolition, pure and simple plans of public housing.
for the truth, in Italy, thanks to the notorious Article 41 of the Constitution, Until not many years ago (though many, actually), even the housing sector was public or private : the great age of plan ina-house it was the apotheosis qualitative, that the apotheosis of the IACP quantitative. and when the quality collapsed, rather than ask why and find solutions, the answer was the abolition, pure and simple plans of public housing.
the plan ina-house was the opportunity (as fanfani launched by Democrats and the pyre, then sponsored a bit 'all the others) to give work to the construction companies, to construction workers, engineers to design and construction; was the field testing of new techniques and solutions, which took into account the state of the art building, but they proposed a common path to revival through innovation and experimentation, real value added of ' construction industry (who now prefers to rent and real estate) was the natural evolution of building plans undertaken during the years of fascist dictatorship in the new context of freedom and social mobility.
today, of course, a government and a political vision chaired and dominated by a man who began as a building contractor can not pursue the path that is following: with the consequence of loss of control the territory, once it is given (unregulated) private initiative.
is also why an entrepreneur is not good as chairman of the board (and if you remember who offers even a Montezemolo ...).
0 comments:
Post a Comment